ChatGPT: Percepción en estudiantes de Trabajo Social de universidades públicas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53940/reys.v5i9.197Palabras clave:
percepción, Trabajo Social, aprendizaje, ChatGPTResumen
Este artículo reporta la percepción de 158 estudiantes de 3 universidades públicas peruanas sobre el uso de ChatGPT. Se realizó un análisis de frecuencia y clasificación jerárquica descendente para visualizar de forma jerárquica la organización, relación y contenido textual representativo de los discursos de los estudiantes. Los hallazgos indican que los estudiantes perciben que el ChatGPT puede ser una herramienta de apoyo inicial para encontrar información de manera rápida, pero que también puede generar dependencia y correr el riesgo de encontrar con información no confiable o de baja calidad, lo cual impactaría en su proceso de aprendizaje.
Descargas
Citas
Albayati, H. (2024). Investigating undergraduate students' perceptions and awareness of using ChatGPT as a regular assistance tool: A user acceptance perspective study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100203
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., ... & Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F. F., Al-shami, S. A., & Slamene, R. (2023). Analyzing the students' views, concerns, and perceived ethics about ChatGPT usage. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180
Firat, M. (2023). How ChatGPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/9ge8m
Haindl, P., & Weinberger, G. (2024). Students’ Experiences of Using ChatGPT in an Undergraduate Programming Course. IEEE Access, 12, 43519-43529. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3380909
Huallpa, J. J. (2023). Exploring the ethical considerations of using Chat GPT in university education. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 11(4), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v11i4.3770
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Ngo, T. T. A. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 18(17), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019
Ooi, K.-B., Tan, G. W.-H., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Capatina, A., Chakraborty, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Huang, T.-L., Kar, A. K., Lee, V.-H., Loh, X.-M., Micu, A., Mikalef, P., Mogaji, E., Pandey, N., Raman, R., Ramakrishnan, R., Rana, N. P., Sarker, P., Sharma, A., Teng, C.-I., Wamba, S. F., & Wong, L.-W. (2023). The potential of generative artificial intelligence across disciplines: Perspectives and future directions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2261010
Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development (Working Papers on Education Policy n° 07). UNESCO. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/6533
Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q. L., & Tang, Y. (2023). A brief overview of ChatGPT: The history, status quo and potential future development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10(5), 1122-1136. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2023.123618
Prentzas, J., & Sidiropoulou, M. (2024). Integrating OpenAI Chat-GPT in a University Department of Education: Main Types of Use [Conference paper]. In Extended Selected Papers of the 14th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems, and Applications: Iisa2023 (Vol. 1093, p. 306). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67426-6_13
Qadir, J. (2023, May 1-4). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education [Conference paper]. In 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). Kuwai. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International journal of Artificial intelligence in Education, 26, 582-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3
Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara-Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at university as a tool for complex thinking: Students’ perceived usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458
Sahu, P. K., Benjamin, L. A., Singh Aswal, G., & Williams-Persad, A. (2024). ChatGPT in research and health professions education: challenges, opportunities, and future directions. Postgraduate medical journal, 100(1179), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgad090
Sarker, I. H. (2022). AI-based modeling: techniques, applications and research issues towards automation, intelligent and smart systems. SN Computer Science, 3(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01043-x
Shoufan, A. (2023). Exploring students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: Thematic analysis and follow-up survey. IEEE Access, 11, 38805-38818. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3268224
Souza, M., Wall, M., Thuler, A., Lowen, I. M. V., & Peres, A. (2018). The use of IRAMUTEQ software for data analysis in qualitative research. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 52, e03353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2017015003353
Tangadulrat, P., Sono, S., & Tangtrakulwanich, B. (2023). Using ChatGPT for clinical practice and medical education: cross-sectional survey of medical Students’ and Physicians’ perceptions. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e50658. https://doi.org/10.2196/50658
Thomae, A. V., Witt, C. M., & Barth, J. (2024). Integration of ChatGPT Into a Course for Medical Students: Explorative Study on Teaching Scenarios, Students’ Perception, and Applications. JMIR Medical Education, 10(1), e50545. https://doi.org/10.2196/50545
Tsang, R. (2023). Practical applications of ChatGPT in undergraduate medical education. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 10, https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205231178449
White, L., Balart, T., Amani, S., Shryock, K. J., & Watson, K. L. (2024). A Preliminary Exploration of the Disruption of a Generative AI Systems: Faculty/Staff and Student Perceptions of ChatGPT and its Capability of Completing Undergraduate Engineering Coursework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01538. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.01538
Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1181712. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712
Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT for next generation science learning. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 29(3), 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1145/358964
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista Educación y Sociedad
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
