El juego de Monopolio en una universidad privada de Lima: estudio de las percepciones estudiantiles

The Monopoly game in a private university in Lima: study of student perceptions




Palabras clave:

Monopolio, educación financiera, inmersión, autodeterminación


El presente trabajo evalúa la aplicación del juego Monopolio desde la perspectiva de estudiantes de una universidad privada. Es una investigación cualitativa, de carácter descriptivo fenomenológico. Se usó como técnica un grupo focal (5 participantes) para evaluar desde las percepciones de los estudiantes presenciales. Siguiendo los antecedentes y continuando con lo desarrollado por la teoría de la autodeterminación y de la inmersión en juegos, se encuentra que existe una reacción positiva ante la motivación para desarrollarse académica y actitudinalmente gracias a la aplicación del juego; no obstante, la naturaleza hibrida de la sesión generó problemas técnicos que impidieron una inmersión.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.


Alamri, H., Lowell, V., Watson, W., y Watson, S. (2020) Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 322-352, https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449

Bergner, J. y Brooks, M. (2017). The Efficacy of Using Monopoly to Improve Undergraduate Students’ Understanding of the Accounting Cycle. Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations Advances in Accounting Education, 20, 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1085-462220170000020003

Calleja, G. (2011). In-Game: From Immersion to Incorporation. MIT Press.

Chiu, T. K. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 14-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998

Cruz, E., Barbosa, Y., Falcão, R., y Mancebo, R. (2018). Use of monopoly as a tool for teaching entrepreneurship and financial education—Old wine in new bottles? Paper presented at the Proceedings of United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Los Angeles, CA.

Daniels, M., Sarte, E., y De la Cruz, J. (2019). Students' perception on e-learning: a basis for the development of e-learning framework in higher education institutions. International Conference on Information Technology and Digital Applications (ICITDA 2018), 482, 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/482/1/012008

El-Sayed, I. (2020). Accounting students' perceptions on e-learning during the covid- 19 pandemic: Preliminary evidence from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Management and Business Education, 3(3), 236-249, https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2020.0015

Ensslin, A. (2014a). Literary Gaming. MIT Press.

Ensslin, A. (2014b). Playing with Rather than by the Rules: metaludicity, allusive fallacy and illusory agency. in Bell, A., Ensslin, A. y Rustad, H. K. (Eds.), Analyzing Digital Fiction (pp. 69-88). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078112

Gagne, M., y Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322

Hagenauer, G., Gläser-Zikuda, M., y Moschner, B. (2018). University students’ emotions, life-satisfaction and study commitment: a self-determination theoretical perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(6), 808-826. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1323189

Hamui, A. y Varela, M. (2013). La técnica de grupos focales. Investigación en Educación Médica, 2(5), pp. 55-60, https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=349733230009

Herrador, T., Hernández, M., Hontoria, J., y Salmat, N. (2020). Online Learning Tools in the Era of m-Learning: Utility and Attitudes in Accounting College Students. Sustainability, 12(12), 5171. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12125171

Hesse-Biber, S., y Leavy, P. (2006). The Practice of Qualitative Research. Sage.

Hiltz, S., Shea, P., y Kim, E. (2022). Using focus groups to study ALN faculty motivation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 14(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i1.1741

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., y Bond, A. (2020). The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Educasae Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Izah A., y Manisah, S. (2022). Putra Salamanis board game: the game of bookkeeping for fundamental financial accounting learning. Accounting Education, 31(5), 596-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2021.2015408

Krueger, R. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage.

Lew, C., y Saville, A. (2021). Game-based learning: Teaching principles of economics and investment finance through Monopoly. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100567

Loon, M, Evans, J., y Kerridge, C. (2015). Learning with a strategic management simulation game: A case study. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(3), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2015.06.002

Mastilak, C. (2012). First-Day Strategies for Millennial Students in Introductory Accounting Courses: It's All Fun and Games Until Something Gets Learned. Journal of Education for Business, 87(1), 48-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2011.557102

Psotka, J. (2013). Educational Games and Virtual Reality as Disruptive Technologies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 69–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.16.2.69

Ryan, M.-L. (2001a) Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Johns Hopkins UP.

Ryan, M.-L. (2001b) Beyond Myth and Metaphor -The Case of Narrative in Digital Media. Game Studies, 1(1). www.gamestudies.org/0101/ryan/

Ryan, R. M., y Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory. Basic Psychological Needs in Motivacion, Development and Wellness. Guilford Press.

Silveira, D., Colomé, C., Heck, T. y Viero, V. (2015). Grupo focal y análisis de contenido en investigación cualitativa. Index de Enfermería, 24(1-2), 71-75. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S1132-12962015000100016

Statler, M., Heracleous, L., y Jacobs, C. D. (2011). Serious play as a practice of paradox. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(2), 236-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886311398453

Williams, A., y Katz, L. (2001). The Use of Focus Group Methodology in Education: Some Theoretical and Practical Considerations. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 5(3). https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/iejll/index.php/iejll/article/view/496

Vallarino, M., Iacono, S., Zolezzi, D., & Vercelli, G. V. (2022). Online peer instruction on Moodle to foster students’ engagement at the time of COVID-19 pandemic. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(4), 628-637.

Van, V. D. (2020). Teaching Basic Financial Literacy Using the MonopolyTM Board Game in English as a Foreign Language. OA-mg. https://oa.mg/work/3154347510




Cómo citar

Zambrano Aranda, G. (2023). El juego de Monopolio en una universidad privada de Lima: estudio de las percepciones estudiantiles: The Monopoly game in a private university in Lima: study of student perceptions. Revista Educación Y Sociedad, 4(7), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.53940/reys.v4i7.138